Skip to content
The Philanthropist Journal
The Philanthropist Journal Subscribe
The Philanthropist Journal
Search Subscribe

News and Analysis for the Non-Profit Sector

  • Analysis
  • Philanthropy and Funding
  • Public Policy
  • Personalities & Interviews
  • All Articles
The Philanthropist Journal

    About

    About

  • General Info
  • History
  • People
  • Contact
Search Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

    Issues & Sectors

  • Arts and Culture
  • Civic Engagement
  • Community Development
  • Decolonization and Reconciliation
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Economy and Workforce
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration and Settlement
  • International Development
  • Poverty
  • Youth

    Sections

  • Analysis
  • Announcements
  • Book Reviews
  • Case Studies & Guides
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Personalities & Interviews

    Series

  • Arctic Inspiration Prize
  • Arts and Culture
  • Charity Law Reform
  • COVID-19
  • Mission Transition
  • Narrative Change
  • Policy Advocacy
  • Policy Matters
  • Reimagining Philanthropy in Canada
  • Rethinking Philanthropy
  • Work in Progress

    Topics

  • Accounting
  • Collaboration
  • Communications
  • Governance
  • Human Resources
  • Leadership
  • Legal and Regulatory
  • Organizational Development
  • Outcomes and Impact
  • Philanthropy and Funding
  • Public Policy
  • Social Finance
  • Social Innovation

    For Contributors

    Contribute to the Journal

  • Contributors’ guidelines

    Legal

  • Our values
  • Accessibility statement
  • Privacy statement
  • Republishing guidelines
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Book Review: Philanthropy in Democratic Societies: History, Institutions, and Values

Published May 29, 2017

Written by

Juniper Glass Juniper Glass, MPNL, is principal of Lumiere Consulting, supporting funders, national non-profits and Indigenous organizations with strategy, research and evaluation. Juniper is a frequent contributor to the discourse on systems change philanthropy in Canada and a research associate with PhiLab, the Canadian Philanthropy Partnership Research Network.

Share Twitter Facebook Linkedin Email

Sections Book Reviews

Issues & Sectors Civic Engagement

Topics Leadership, Social Finance

ISSN 2562-1491

Original Link https://thephilanthropist.ca/2017/05/book-review-philanthropy-in-democratic-societies-history-institutions-and-values/

Download Choose Print or Save to PDF in the print dialogue and turn off “Header and Footers”

Read more

Case Studies & Guides

Maison Mère : Accelérateur d’initiatives citoyennes

People picnicking in the field behind Maison Mère

Case Studies & Guides

Solon: Citizen-led action for mobility, energy, and ‘third places’

People gathering outdoors on a sunny day talking..

Case Studies & Guides

Solon : L’action citoyenne autour de la mobilité, de l’énergie, et des tiers-lieux

People gathering outdoors on a sunny day talking..
Explore More Articles

Philanthropy in Democratic Societies: History, Institutions, Values, Edited by Rob Reich, Chiara Cordelli and Lucy Bernholz, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2016, ISBN: 978-0-226-33550-6

Philanthropy is a “hybrid and ever-changing form of public and private power” (p.7). This is the central image of philanthropy – in flux, contested, and always in relationship to market and state – that emerges from Philanthropy in Democratic Societies, an edited volume of 10 highly diverse articles by historians, philosophers, legal scholars, and social scientists.

The title of the book is somewhat of a misnomer. “Philanthropy in American Society” would have been more apt, as all examples come from a US context. Nevertheless, there are enough parallels between the development of US and Canadian philanthropic concepts, laws, and practices to make the volume relevant for students, researchers, and practitioners in this country.

The book was my companion during what I dubbed “philanthropy season in Canada,” spring 2017, when the sector hosted three national conferences within as many weeks (respectively by PhiLab, The Circle on Philanthropy and Aboriginal Peoples, and Community Foundations of Canada). The scholarly approaches taken by the authors of Philanthropy in Democratic Societies added dimension to the practitioner perspectives – both foundations and non-profits/community partners –, which were the focus of the conferences.

A key conversation emerged during the PhiLab event, in which participants repeatedly questioned the role of grant making foundations because of their lack of “democracy.” It was the first time I had heard the term used this way in Canada as opposed to more common critiques related to foundations’ impact, accountability, or transparency. At the same event, participants developed a shared understanding that foundations never act alone (even though it may seem like it) but always in relation to other system actors, recognizing that a foundation’s role in the wider ecosystem will lead to better analysis and practice. The book echoes these observations. Indeed, a central point made in the text is that philanthropy is embedded in webs of interaction with various powers, policies, organizations, and cultural norms:

“What philanthropy is, whether a friend or foe of a democracy, an act of benevolence or a duty of justice, depends on how it relates to other institutions within the broader structure of society. It also depends on whether or not a fair distribution of wealth and power has been already secured in society” (p.205).

The first section of the book, “Origins,” contains historical accounts of US philanthropy as well as an overview by Reich of the main arguments for and against foundations having an active role in society. He concludes that philanthropy is not necessarily incompatible with democracy and that foundations can, in fact, contribute to it if they increase the diversity of provision of public goods (the pluralism argument) or support innovation (the discovery argument). Although this chapter does not cover new ground, it is useful in its brevity and provides good orientation material for new students or practitioners of philanthropy.

In the middle section, “Institutional Forms,” I found the chapter by Horvath and Powell particularly exciting. They again trace the evolution of US philanthropy, but this time examining how different forms either contribute to or disrupt democracy. “Disruption” has come to be used in recent years as a normatively positive term, particularly in social innovation discourse, to mean something that shifts the status quo and makes people look at an issue in a new way. The authors are leery of the growing tendency of wealthy donors and foundations “to alter the public conversation about which social issues matter, to set an agenda . . . and to specify the preferred provider of services to address these issues without any engagement in the deliberative processes of civil society” (p.119).

Chapter 5, “When is Philanthropy?” investigates a particular institutional form, the donor-advised fund (DAF). Although discussed in terms of US regulations and practices, the questions raised about tax treatment and payout rules are timely in the Canadian context, in light of the federal government’s recent commitment to modernize the regulatory framework governing non-profits and charities. DAFs have been experiencing a huge boom over the last decade, and concerns about them are not new. Instead of examining the common criticism that they involve too much donor control, the author takes issue with timelines, asking, “what happens when dollars have been set aside for charitable use, but not yet put to use?” (p.158). He proposes a new category of philanthropic form, the “charitable checking account” that sets out payout rules to ensure that charitable gifts do not just provide immediate tax benefits to donors but also ensure they get used for public benefit in a timely manner.

The last section of the book, “Moral Grounds and Limits,” makes a strong contribution to the field, presenting three unique philosophical responses to the question of what role philanthropy should play in contributing to a just society. As the authors point out, the legitimate scope of both the state and the market have been widely debated, and these chapters help to advance a much less treated subject, the moral limits of philanthropy “as both a form of private power and as a funding mechanism for public services” (p.203). This section, like the entire book, is marked by a patient attention to detail and careful building of arguments, refreshing in this rapid-fire era of blogs and tweets about the next big idea about philanthropy.

The volume lacks a conclusion, which is surprising given the manner in which the book was developed – through a series of dialogues among the authors to advance their individual and collective thinking. I would like to know what this group of scholars thinks are the next big questions for research and theorizing on philanthropy. Since the key takeaways of each chapter range widely, a summary of the main convergent and divergent points that arise from this interdisciplinary work would not only bring the book together but also offer conceptual guideposts for readers attempting to apply insights in their own work in the field.

Finally, and of most interest to me as someone compelled to build bridges between financial and social capital and community-led change, the book does not explore the mechanisms by which dominant forms of philanthropy could become more democratic. Horvath and Powell conclude their critique by stating that, “if philanthropists genuinely want their gifts to have lasting, contributory effects on society, they need to move beyond their embrace of disruption and think more systematically about the involvement of those whose lives are affected by their efforts” (p.122). Neither they nor the other authors discuss how to bring about such community involvement.

Luckily, as I witnessed during my spring conference tour, Canada has a growing body of knowledge and wisdom about how we can practice philanthropy in support of democratic ideals and power sharing with communities. For example, Itoah Scott-Enns’ presentation at The Circle conference, published recently in The Philanthropist, provides clear analysis and ways forward to “ensure the Indigenous perspective is co-leading reconciliation in philanthropy.” Scholarly work such as Philanthropy in Democratic Societies urges us to deepen our thinking about the purpose and place of philanthropy while thought leadership by practitioners offers action strategies to make their field and practice more inclusive and democratic.

Read more

Case Studies & Guides

Maison Mère : Accelérateur d’initiatives citoyennes

People picnicking in the field behind Maison Mère

Case Studies & Guides

Solon: Citizen-led action for mobility, energy, and ‘third places’

People gathering outdoors on a sunny day talking..

Case Studies & Guides

Solon : L’action citoyenne autour de la mobilité, de l’énergie, et des tiers-lieux

People gathering outdoors on a sunny day talking..
Explore More Articles

Subscribe

Weekly news & analysis

Staying current on the Canadian non-profit sector has never been easier

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Twitter Facebook Linkedin Email

Sections Book Reviews

Issues & Sectors Civic Engagement

Topics Leadership, Social Finance

Explore More Articles

Opinions

Combatting polarization by transforming anger into action

Abdul Nakua

An abstract illustration of a crowd of people standing apart with circles dividing people.

Book Reviews

Resilience and the management of non-profit organizations

Peter Broder

Case Studies & Guides

It can be done: Catalyzing positive societal impacts through foundations’ invested assets

Chad Park and Greg Elliott

Text: Navigating Responsible Investing

Analysis

Why moral organizations’ success is crucial to people and planet

Robyn Waite

Lettered tiles that spell "philanthropy"

Most Popular

Analysis

Volunteerism: In crisis or at a crossroads?

Yvonne Rodney

Illustration of two hands above and below an open door.

Opinions

The problem of systemic bias in CRA audits

Faisal Kutty and Faisal Bhabha

Analysis

Building the charitable sector’s policy muscle

Tim Harper

Illustration of four people in different colours. One is in a wheelchair and holding a striped flag. Another is standing with their hands on their hips. Two are facing each other and one is holding a clipboard.

Opinions

Gender-based philanthropy: Where did we go wrong?

Nicola Hives

    About

    About

  • General Info
  • History
  • People
  • Contact

    For Contributors

    Contribute to the Journal

  • Contributors’ guidelines

Get Weekly Email Newsletters

News and analysis by and for the Canadian non-profit sector directly in your inbox

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

© Copyright 2023 The Philanthropist Journal. All rights reserved.

    Legal

  • Our values
  • Accessibility statement
  • Privacy statement
  • Republishing guidelines
The Philanthropist Journal.